Evidence unequivocally shows no explosion in shareholder class actions

Vince Morabito’s latest paper addresses a number of facts concerning shareholder class actions in Australia, finding that much commentary on class actions has been inaccurate, and he unequivocally finds there has been no explosion of shareholder class actions in Australia either over the last 27 years or so in recent years.

In the paper he states (at p 10, emphasis in original):

Pointing to alleged instances of abuse or unsatisfactory conduct by those running or supporting shareholder class actions, if substantiated, does not alter the conclusion [that there is no need for restricting the ability of shareholders to bring class action proceedings or to reduce their substantive legal rights].

Such a scenario would only support providing stronger powers to courts presiding over such proceedings to enable them to deal effectively with any instances of unacceptable conduct.

Particularly unpersuasive are calls for reform of this area based on the argument that the fear of being on the receiving end of a shareholder class action will adversely affect the future strategies adopted by numerous company directors and, as a result, adversely affect Australia’s economy.

This line of reasoning displays an unwillingness to accept the behaviour modification/deterrence of illegal conduct goal of class actions. Knowledge that victims of illegal behaviour have at their disposal an effective procedural device for seeking legal redress is intended to make company directors, manufacturers, suppliers of services, employers and others take far greater care (than would otherwise be the case) in ensuring that their activities do not contravene the law and cause harm or loss to others. Furthermore … only a miniscule proportion of listed companies and their directors have been on the receiving end of shareholder class actions.

He also makes the following points:

  • much of the analysis and commentary on shareholder class actions has been inaccurate (p 8);
  • there is no basis at all for the claim that the employment of the class action regime by shareholders was not envisaged, intended or anticipated by the creators of Part IVA (p 9);
  • since Part IVA was introduced, there has been an average of 23 class actions per year, and an average of 46.8 per year over the last five years, debunking the myth that “the floodgates have opened” or that “there has been an explosion of class actions” (pp 12-4);
  • since Part IVA was introduced, there has been a total of 122 shareholder class actions (19.2% of all class actions over that period), albeit in respect of only 63 different companies or groups of companies (and not always against the company itself) (pp 15-6);
  • in recent years, the number of shareholder class actions filed, as a percentage of all class actions filed, has been declining (p 16);
  • in light of the above “it can be confidently concluded that there has been no explosion of shareholder class actions in Australia either over the last 27 years or so or in recent years” (p 16);
  • despite claims to the contrary, directors of companies are only personally sued in a small minority of shareholder class actions (p 19);
  • most shareholder class actions (82.8%) are supported by a litigation funder (p 20); and
  • shareholder class actions have resulted in at least $888.6 million being paid to at least 94,984 shareholders (at an average of $9,355 per class member) (p 21).

Andrew Watson

National Head of Class Actions, Class actions, Melbourne

"I'm an experienced litigator in class actions, particularly for shareholders who have been victims of corporate misconduct."

Ben Slade

State Managing Principal, Office Leader, Class actions, Sydney

"I am driven to give a voice to those who would otherwise have to suffer because those who have done them wrong are all too powerful."

Kimi Nishimura

Principal Lawyer, Class actions, Melbourne

"I'm committed to fighting for the rights of victims of corporate misconduct as well as pursuing compensation on behalf of my clients."

Rebecca Gilsenan

Executive Director, Principal Lawyer, Class actions, Sydney

"I have extensive experience in running complex and novel litigation, including class actions in the areas of price fixing, failed investment schemes, product liability and securities."

Miranda Nagy

Principal Lawyer, Class actions, Sydney

"I have a strong conviction that the community should be able to expect our governments and the companies we deal with to comply with the law."

Julian Schimmel

Principal Lawyer, Class actions, Sydney

"Class actions are a unique legal mechanism that have helped hundreds of thousands of people receive compensation after mistreatment at the hands of powerful companies, and it’s gratifying to help people get access to justice when otherwise it would’ve been difficult for them."

Vavaa Mawuli

Principal, Class actions, Brisbane

"The most rewarding thing about my work is the change in scale of what we are able to accomplish."

It doesn’t cost you anything to know where you stand

Can we help?
Find an office near you
Your local office

Let us contact you

It doesn’t cost you anything to know where you stand

We take calls 24/7

Call us now
1800 305 568

Free Call

Find an office near you
Your local office

Let us contact you