Silicosis is a scary condition - it is incurable and can result in awful symptoms. To add further weight to that felt by silicosis sufferers, a recent decision of the Supreme Court of New South Wales has dealt a blow to workers suffering from silicosis who worked for employers who (illegally) did not take out workers compensation insurance.
In the recent decision of Workers Compensation Nominal Insurer v Sako [2025] NSWCA 12, the Supreme Court of New South Wales clarified the law regarding uninsured liabilities.
Plaintiffs’ lawyers and their clients were extremely concerned to learn that the Supreme Court has decided that workers whose employers were illegally uninsured when they were exposed to harmful silica and other workplace dusts do not have any legal remedy against the NSW state insurer, the Workers Compensation Nominal Insurer (WCNI).
Workers who suffer injuries other than dust diseases like silicosis and whose employers did not take out compulsory insurance can recover damages against the WCNI. But if their injuries are dust-related, and the employer did not have insurance, they must endure their silicosis without a remedy to seek damages against the WCNI.
At a time when thirteen tunnel workers in Sydney were diagnosed with silicosis, and countless stonemasons are being diagnosed with silicosis, this conclusion demonstrates the urgent need for the reform of dust diseases law in New South Wales.
Compulsory employers’ liability insurance was established in New South Wales almost 50 years ago to protect workers. Employers who fail to purchase insurance are guilty of breaking the law and are subject to prosecution, fines, and other legal remedies.
The law also recognises that rogue employers exist, but employees suffering serious injury while working for an uninsured employer would receive the compensation they need to continue supporting their families while getting their lives back on track.
Because of the Workers Compensation Act 1987 (NSW), the WCNI effectively stands in the shoes of what would have been the insurer and meets compensation claims brought at common law in the usual way.
Now, in what can only be described as a gap in the law or an unintended drafting error by legislators, employees of an uninsured employer who are affected by workplace accidents can be compensated, just as long as the damage done to you at work is not dust-related.
The basis of the Supreme Court’s decision is that a dust disease does not constitute an “injury” for the purposes of section 140 of the Workers Compensation Act 1987 (NSW). The Supreme Court went on to conclude that the definition of "work injury damages" in section 250 of the Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998 (NSW) excludes dust diseases from section 140.
Accordingly, the plaintiff, Mr Sako, cannot now pursue the WCNI for his claim against his uninsured employer, Rabi Harmes. Mr Sako was employed as a stone mason by Rabi Harmes between 2009 and 2012 and was exposed to harmful silica dust, which contributed to his subsequently developing silicosis. In addition to working for Mr Harmes, Mr Sako was also exposed to silica dust while working for other insured employers.
It was common ground that Rabi Harmes had not purchased employers’ liability insurance at the time of Mr Sako’s dust exposure. Mr Sako’s lawyers brought the case against employers and stone manufacturers but argued that the WCNI should stand in the place of what would have been the insurer of Mr Harmes’s business and contribute towards the settlement sum.
The claim failed.
The decision reinforces the longstanding legislative distinction between dust diseases and other workplace injuries in the context of workers' compensation. However, as we see more cases of uninsured operators of stonemasonry businesses causing serious injury to workers, the law must change to reflect the needs of those impacted.
If a broken leg is an injury for which a person can be compensated even if their employer didn’t take out insurance, why isn’t a dust disease treated the same way?
A better safety net is required, and legislators should address that urgently.
If you or someone you know is diagnosed with dust or other occupational diseases, contact our team for a free, no-obligation consultation to discuss your potential legal entitlements.
Our team of experienced dust disease lawyers are here to help you understand your legal options and to ensure you get the compensation you're entitled to.
Document exposure now in case you develop an asbestos related disease later. This can help you with a future compensation claim.
Our experienced lawyers have a long history of fighting for the rights of people suffering from asbestos, silica and other dust related illnesses. If you've been diagnosed with a dust disease, you may have a claim for compensation.
We are here to help. Give us a call, request a call back or use our free claim check tool to get in touch with our friendly legal team. With local knowledge and a national network of experts, we have the experience you can count on.
We have lawyers who specialise in a range of legal claims who travel to Australian Capital Territory. If you need a lawyer in Canberra or elsewhere in Australian Capital Territory, please call us on 1800 675 346.
We have lawyers who specialise in a range of legal claims who travel to Tasmania. If you need a lawyer in Hobart, Launceston or elsewhere in Tasmania, please call us on 1800 675 346.