The problem with wire rope safety barriers

Many would agree that some of the worst road trauma is as a result of head-on collisions, closely followed by accidents involving trees and telephone poles, on high speed stretches of road.

News reports and photographs of accident scenes, along with now infamous TAC commercials re-creating these events, are no doubt burned into the brain of many Australian motorists.  And perhaps it’s images like these that have underwritten the rise of wire barriers in Australia.  

Wire rope safety barriers (wire barriers), also known as flexible barriers or cable fences, are highly tensioned wire ropes, supported by steel posts. The barriers are designed to slow or stop wayward vehicles by absorbing their impact and, in doing so, reduce major off-road and head-on collisions on our roads.     

Wire barriers are quick and easy to install and are, at least in the short term, relatively cheap.

The use of wire barriers is increasingly popular in Australia as shown by a recent government announcement that a further 330km of the barriers are to be installed in Victoria alone in the coming year.

So, what’s the problem with wire barriers?

“In some areas wire barriers are pretty good, but if you’re not careful where you put them they can be incredibly dangerous” says road safety expert and Australian Motorcycle Council spokesman, Guy Stanford.  

Motorcyclists, in particular, have raised concerns that wire barriers can act as a “cheese cutter” when riders fall or slide into them. But, according to Stanford, “The biggest problem is the vertical posts. Upright objects are a motorcyclists’ worst enemy. Whether it’s a tree, a telephone pole or a post in a fence, where there’s an upright, that’s where the force is concentrated and that’s what kills or seriously injures riders.”    

It’s not only motorcyclists who are put at risk where wire barriers are unsuitably installed. Their effectiveness relies on the wire remaining highly tensioned, and even minor contact with vehicles can cause the barriers to slacken. It’s expensive and time consuming to “retention” the wire, meaning many remain slack and of little use.

Wire barriers also have limited capacity to slow or absorb the energy of larger vehicles like trucks and buses when compared with, say, a concrete barrier. It’s estimated that wire barriers will often become “frangible” (break into fragments) when struck by vehicles heavier than 700kg, depending of course on the speed the vehicle is travelling.  

In contrast, the strength of concrete barriers means they’re not regularly slackened, knocked over or driven straight through by heavy vehicles. Concrete barriers are more expensive to install but the costly maintenance of wire barriers means they are more expensive over their life cycle. 

But, perhaps most importantly, the smooth surface created by concrete barriers is by far the safest for motorcyclists, who tend to slide along the road surface after an accident. If the first point of impact is a smooth surface they are far less likely to be killed or seriously injured. Though, as Stanford points out, “Anything will kill you if you hit it hard enough. But having a smooth surface at least gives the rider a chance, the posts are lethal.”   

What’s the answer?

“There has to be a very careful set of criteria used to determine whether wire barriers, concrete barriers or something else is installed in a particular area. At the moment wire barriers are the latest craze and the authorities have decided to stick them up everywhere, but a one-size-fits-all approach doesn’t work when it comes to road safety” Stanford says. 

“Wire barriers are quite good in certain areas, particularly where there’s room between the road shoulder and the barrier. In some areas, authorities have also started padding the vertical posts, which is sensible, though a smooth surface like a concrete barrier would be preferable.” 

TOPIC: Smidsy
RELATED LEGAL SERVICES: Motorcycle riders

Share this article on:

John Rule

Maurice Blackburn Greensborough
John Rule is an Associate in Maurice Blackburn’s Greensborough office who also sees clients in Whittlesea. He helps injured clients with compensation claims under the TAC and WorkCover systems. John graduated from the University of Melbourne with a Bachelor of Laws in 2010 and completed a Bachelor of Arts at Boston College in 2011. He joined Maurice Blackburn later the same year, and was admitted to practice in 2013. John likes to be a positive force for people in the community in their time of need and he has a strong conviction that everyone deserves a ‘fair go’. He understands that the odds are often stacked in such a way that the needs of everyday people often go unmet, and he works hard to redress this. “I enjoy fighting for the rights of everyday Australians to achieve fair results, especially when there’s an imbalance of power,” says John. “People who are seriously injured require legal advice and advocacy when dealing with insurance companies and the TAC in order to protect their interests and ensure they receive their full entitlements and I believe that Maurice Blackburn is the leading firm in this area. I’m proud of the work we do and the way we do it." John also likes speaking up for vulnerable road users, such as cyclists and motorcyclists. He is an active supporter of Maurice Blackburn’s Stop SMIDSY (Sorry Mate I Didn’t See You) road safety campaign and was part of the legal team that successfully appealed a Magistrates’ Court decision to fine a motorcycle rider using a camera on his helmet. Memberships & accreditations Law Institute of Victoria Australian Lawyers Alliance Eastern Suburbs Young Lawyers ...

Read more

See all contributors